London borough · England

Road risk in Hammersmith and Fulham

Hammersmith and Fulham ranks 25 of 192 British highway authorities on our road risk score. Here is what the official record shows, and how it compares.

Above averageRisk score 67.9/100ONS code E09000013

Police recorded 535 injury collisions in Hammersmith and Fulham in 2025, hurting 589 people, of whom 109 were killed or seriously injured and 1 were killed. Set against the traffic its roads actually carry, that is 364.6 killed or seriously injured per billion vehicle miles, 353% above the median ranked authority (80.5).

Collisions
535 in 2025
People hurt
589 casualties
Killed or seriously injured
109
Killed
1
KSI per billion vehicle miles
364.6 (median 80.5)
KSI, three-year average
108.3 a year
Severity-adjusted KSI, 2025
110 (recorded: 109)
Severity-adjusted KSI, three-year average
109.7 a year (recorded: 108.3)
KSI per 100,000 residents
57.3 — rank 13
Population
190,216
Risk score
67.9/100 — rank 25 of 192

Compiled by Stephen Hall, Data lead, Swift Assist. Source: DfT STATS19 and DfT road traffic estimates (2025), OGL v3. Updated 2026-10-08.

Direction of travel

Five years of collisions in Hammersmith and Fulham

Across 2021–2025, recorded collisions were down 13.3%, with 2021 the worst year of the period at 617 collisions.

Collisions per year in Hammersmith and Fulham

2025: 535 (down 1.1% on the year before) · peak 617 in 2021 · -13.3% across the period

61720215622022585202354120245352025

Axis clipped to the data range to show year-on-year movement.

Two ways of measuring

Hammersmith and Fulham looks less dangerous per mile driven than per resident

Divide casualties by the people who live here and Hammersmith and Fulham ranks 13. Divide by the miles actually driven on its roads and it ranks 25 — a difference of 12 places.

That gap runs the other way: relative to the traffic its roads carry, Hammersmith and Fulham does less harm than its casualty count per resident implies. Places with heavy local travel and few through routes tend to look worse per head than the volume of driving warrants. Neither number is the true one. Which you should use depends on whether you are asking how safe it is to live somewhere or how safe it is to drive there.

Vehicle crime · year ending June 2026

Vehicle crime in Hammersmith and Fulham

8.27

offences per 1,000 residents

1,560

offences recorded, 12 months

24

of 287 areas, worst first

Hammersmith and Fulham recorded 8.27 vehicle offences per 1,000 residents, above the England and Wales rate of 5.04.

Rate calculated from 1,560 offences and a population of 188,700 (ONS mid-2024), both taken from the same ONS release. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Office for National Statistics, Crime in England and Wales: Police Force Area data tables, year ending June 2026; police recorded crime collected by the Home Office.

Who is being hurt

Pedestrians, cyclists and riders in Hammersmith and Fulham

These are the road users with the least protection when something goes wrong, and they carry a disproportionate share of the serious injuries. Across 535 collisions in Hammersmith and Fulham, the three groups appear 424 times between them — an involvement rate of 79.3%.

Road userCollisionsShare of all collisions
Pedestrians12623.6%
Cyclists19235.9%
Motorcyclists10619.8%

A single collision can involve more than one of these groups and is then counted in each row, so the rows do not add up to a share of the total.

Darkness, weather and the time of year

When collisions happen in Hammersmith and Fulham

DfT records the light level and road surface at every collision, but publishes neither below national level. These are Hammersmith and Fulham’s own shares over 1,661 collisions, with the national figure beside each one for comparison.

Share of collisionsHammersmith and FulhamNationalHow it reads
In darknessAny collision where the officer recorded darkness, lit or unlit.30%28.7%close to the national figure
In darkness, no street lightingThe rural lighting picture rather than the urban speeding one.1.3%6.3%a small fraction of the national figure
On a wet road surfaceWet, damp or standing water at the scene.15.6%24.5%well below the national figure
On snow or iceRare everywhere, and concentrated in a handful of authorities.0.4%1.4%a small fraction of the national figure

On the darkness share, Hammersmith and Fulham ranks 53 of 192 authorities, counting from the highest.

The winter effect. Collisions in Hammersmith and Fulham run 9.4% lower from November to January than from May to July — against 4.5% lower nationally. That is 396 collisions against 437.

What this does not tell you

  • A share is not a rate. A high darkness share means darkness accounts for more of Hammersmith and Fulham’s collisions — not that its roads are more dangerous overall. Read it alongside the casualties-per-mile-driven figure above.
  • Condition is recorded, not tested. The officer records the surface and light level at the scene. It is an observation, not a measurement, and it is not a finding that the condition caused the collision.
  • Exposure is not controlled for. Fewer people travel at 3am than at 3pm, so a collision in darkness is drawn from a smaller pool of journeys. Without hourly traffic counts, these shares describe when collisions happen rather than how risky an hour is.

Every authority compared on the same measures: winter road risk across Britain.

Benchmark

Hammersmith and Fulham against similar authorities

A national rank compares Hammersmith and Fulham with places that may be nothing like it. This is the comparison a council actually uses: its statistical nearest neighbours — the authorities ONS identifies as most similar on population, economy and demography, restricted to the same tier, so counties are compared with counties. Within this group Hammersmith and Fulham is 6 of 11 on casualties per mile driven, against a group median of 364.6.

AuthorityKSI / bn milesScoreNational rank
Southwark480.874.47
Hackney468.372.59
Kensington and Chelsea422.171.311
Lambeth420.966.328
Hammersmith and Fulham (this page)364.667.925
Wandsworth340.364.635
Merton20768.523
Richmond upon Thames206.170.316
Kingston upon Thames101.849.898

Peer group: ONS statistical nearest neighbours, Open Government Licence v3. ONS notes the grouping is a snapshot that is not comparable with earlier editions, and is not a judgement about any authority’s performance. The road figures against it are ours.

National position

Hammersmith and Fulham against its closest comparators

Hammersmith and Fulham sits 25 of 192 nationally, and 25 of 148 within England. These are the authorities nearest to it in the table.

#AuthorityScoreKSI / bn miles
23Merton68.5207
24Croydon68.2181.7
25Hammersmith and Fulham (this page)67.9364.6
26Portsmouth67.4119.4
27Brighton and Hove66.7206.5
See all 192 authorities →
Common questions

Road risk in Hammersmith and Fulham, answered

How dangerous are the roads in Hammersmith and Fulham?

In the latest official DfT figures, 535 road collisions in Hammersmith and Fulham injured or killed 589 people, 109 of them killed or seriously injured. Measured against the traffic its roads actually carry, that is 364.6 people killed or seriously injured per billion vehicle miles, against a median of 80.5 across the ranked authorities — placing Hammersmith and Fulham 25 of 192 authorities on our combined score, where 1 is the highest risk. The score weighs that rate alongside who is being hurt, the five-year trend and how often a serious collision proves fatal, so the rank is not the rate alone.

Are road casualties in Hammersmith and Fulham rising or falling?

Across 2021–2025, recorded collisions in Hammersmith and Fulham were down 13.3%, with 2021 the worst year of the period at 617 collisions. Year-to-year movement in a single authority is noisy, so the five-year direction carries more than any single year's change.

Who is being hurt on Hammersmith and Fulham's roads?

In Hammersmith and Fulham there were 126 collisions involving pedestrians, 192 involving cyclists and 106 involving motorcyclists, out of 535 in total. Added together that is an involvement rate of 79.3%, though a collision involving two of those groups is counted in both figures, so it is a comparable index rather than a clean share.

Who is responsible for road safety in Hammersmith and Fulham?

Hammersmith and Fulham is a london borough, and is the highway authority for its own roads. That means it sets local speed limits, designs junctions and crossings, and decides safety scheme spending. Motorways and most trunk roads are managed separately by National Highways in England, Transport Scotland, or the Welsh Government, so the worst road in an area is often not the council's to change. Enforcement sits with the local police force.

Where does this data come from?

DfT STATS19, the record police complete at the scene of every injury collision, published annually under the Open Government Licence, combined with DfT's own road traffic estimates for the mileage denominator. Collision, casualty and KSI counts on this page are for 2025; only the trend compares 2021–2025. STATS19 counts collisions police attended and recorded, so collisions never reported do not appear, and under-reporting is known to be worst for cyclists and for slight injuries.

What this means for you

What actually changes the odds in Hammersmith and Fulham

Data is only useful if it changes what you do. These three are picked from Hammersmith and Fulham’s own figures above, each with the number that prompted it. Every guide explains how the thing works before it suggests buying anything, and most cost less than a third of a typical insurance excess.

We are a data business, not a retailer: these link to our guides, which link on to retailers. Some of those links earn us a small commission at no cost to you, and we hold no stock and take no payment for placement. All security guides.

Need a report or data cut? Reports from £95 →