Scottish council · Scotland

Road risk in Scottish Borders

Scottish Borders ranks 135 of 192 British highway authorities on our road risk score. Here is what the official record shows, and how it compares.

Below averageRisk score 40.8/100ONS code S12000026

Police recorded 74 injury collisions in Scottish Borders in 2025, hurting 112 people, of whom 51 were killed or seriously injured and 6 were killed. Set against the traffic its roads actually carry, that is 81.7 killed or seriously injured per billion vehicle miles, 1% above the median ranked authority (80.5).

Collisions: 74 in 2025
People hurt: 112 casualties
Killed or seriously injured: 51
Killed: 6
KSI per billion vehicle miles: 81.7 (median 80.5)
KSI, three-year average: 52.3 a year
Severity-adjusted KSI, 2025: 60 (recorded: 51)
Severity-adjusted KSI, three-year average: 65.7 a year (recorded: 52.3)
KSI per 100,000 residents: 43.7 — rank 56
Population: 116,800
Risk score: 40.8/100 — rank 135 of 192

Compiled by Stephen Hall, Data lead, Swift Assist. Source: DfT STATS19 and DfT road traffic estimates (2025), OGL v3. Updated 2026-10-08.

Direction of travel

Five years of collisions in Scottish Borders

Across 2021–2025, recorded collisions were down 27.5%, with 2023 the worst year of the period at 107 collisions.

Collisions per year in Scottish Borders

2025: 74 (down 14.9% on the year before) · peak 107 in 2023 · -27.5% across the period

Axis clipped to the data range to show year-on-year movement.

Two ways of measuring

Scottish Borders looks less dangerous per mile driven than per resident

Divide casualties by the people who live here and Scottish Borders ranks 56. Divide by the miles actually driven on its roads and it ranks 135 — a difference of 79 places.

That gap runs the other way: relative to the traffic its roads carry, Scottish Borders does less harm than its casualty count per resident implies. Places with heavy local travel and few through routes tend to look worse per head than the volume of driving warrants. Neither number is the true one. Which you should use depends on whether you are asking how safe it is to live somewhere or how safe it is to drive there.

Who is being hurt

Pedestrians, cyclists and riders in Scottish Borders

These are the road users with the least protection when something goes wrong, and they carry a disproportionate share of the serious injuries. Across 74 collisions in Scottish Borders, the three groups appear 28 times between them — an involvement rate of 37.8%.

Road user	Collisions	Share of all collisions
Pedestrians	8	10.8%
Cyclists	4	5.4%
Motorcyclists	16	21.6%

A single collision can involve more than one of these groups and is then counted in each row, so the rows do not add up to a share of the total.

Darkness, weather and the time of year

When collisions happen in Scottish Borders

DfT records the light level and road surface at every collision, but publishes neither below national level. These are Scottish Borders’s own shares over 268 collisions, with the national figure beside each one for comparison.

Share of collisions	Scottish Borders	National	How it reads
In darknessAny collision where the officer recorded darkness, lit or unlit.	25%	28.7%	below the national figure
In darkness, no street lightingThe rural lighting picture rather than the urban speeding one.	20.5%	6.3%	more than three times the national figure
On a wet road surfaceWet, damp or standing water at the scene.	33.6%	24.5%	well above the national figure
On snow or iceRare everywhere, and concentrated in a handful of authorities.	3.7%	1.4%	more than double the national figure

On the darkness share, Scottish Borders ranks 158 of 192 authorities, counting from the highest.

The winter effect. Collisions in Scottish Borders run 20.7% lower from November to January than from May to July — against 4.5% lower nationally. That is 65 collisions against 82.

What this does not tell you

A share is not a rate. A high darkness share means darkness accounts for more of Scottish Borders’s collisions — not that its roads are more dangerous overall. Read it alongside the casualties-per-mile-driven figure above.
Condition is recorded, not tested. The officer records the surface and light level at the scene. It is an observation, not a measurement, and it is not a finding that the condition caused the collision.
Exposure is not controlled for. Fewer people travel at 3am than at 3pm, so a collision in darkness is drawn from a smaller pool of journeys. Without hourly traffic counts, these shares describe when collisions happen rather than how risky an hour is.

Every authority compared on the same measures: winter road risk across Britain.

Benchmark

Scottish Borders against similar authorities

A national rank compares Scottish Borders with places that may be nothing like it. This is the comparison a council actually uses: its statistical nearest neighbours — the authorities ONS identifies as most similar on population, economy and demography, restricted to the same tier, so counties are compared with counties. Within this group Scottish Borders is 4 of 9 on casualties per mile driven, against a group median of 66.2.

Authority	KSI / bn miles	Score	National rank
Powys	161.2	65.7	32
Carmarthenshire	123.9	63.2	42
Denbighshire	96.2	52.2	90
Scottish Borders (this page)	81.7	40.8	135
South Ayrshire	66.2	47.3	115
Moray	65.7	56.2	71
Dumfries and Galloway	63.5	47.1	119
Aberdeenshire	55.8	27.7	177
Monmouthshire	51.5	35.6	157

Peer group: ONS statistical nearest neighbours, Open Government Licence v3. ONS notes the grouping is a snapshot that is not comparable with earlier editions, and is not a judgement about any authority’s performance. The road figures against it are ours.

National position

Scottish Borders against its closest comparators

Scottish Borders sits 135 of 192 nationally, and 15 of 26 within Scotland. These are the authorities nearest to it in the table.

#	Authority	Score	KSI / bn miles
133	North Northamptonshire	41.1	58
134	Westmorland and Furness	41.1	61.8
135	Scottish Borders (this page)	40.8	81.7
136	Wokingham	40.2	42.4
137	Staffordshire	40.1	50.9

See all 192 authorities →

Common questions

Road risk in Scottish Borders, answered

How dangerous are the roads in Scottish Borders?

In the latest official DfT figures, 74 road collisions in Scottish Borders injured or killed 112 people, 51 of them killed or seriously injured. Measured against the traffic its roads actually carry, that is 81.7 people killed or seriously injured per billion vehicle miles, against a median of 80.5 across the ranked authorities — placing Scottish Borders 135 of 192 authorities on our combined score, where 1 is the highest risk. The score weighs that rate alongside who is being hurt, the five-year trend and how often a serious collision proves fatal, so the rank is not the rate alone.

Are road casualties in Scottish Borders rising or falling?

Across 2021–2025, recorded collisions in Scottish Borders were down 27.5%, with 2023 the worst year of the period at 107 collisions. Year-to-year movement in a single authority is noisy, so the five-year direction carries more than any single year's change.

Who is being hurt on Scottish Borders's roads?

In Scottish Borders there were 8 collisions involving pedestrians, 4 involving cyclists and 16 involving motorcyclists, out of 74 in total. Added together that is an involvement rate of 37.8%, though a collision involving two of those groups is counted in both figures, so it is a comparable index rather than a clean share.

Who is responsible for road safety in Scottish Borders?

Scottish Borders is a scottish council, and is the highway authority for its own roads. That means it sets local speed limits, designs junctions and crossings, and decides safety scheme spending. Motorways and most trunk roads are managed separately by National Highways in England, Transport Scotland, or the Welsh Government, so the worst road in an area is often not the council's to change. Enforcement sits with the local police force.

Where does this data come from?

DfT STATS19, the record police complete at the scene of every injury collision, published annually under the Open Government Licence, combined with DfT's own road traffic estimates for the mileage denominator. Collision, casualty and KSI counts on this page are for 2025; only the trend compares 2021–2025. STATS19 counts collisions police attended and recorded, so collisions never reported do not appear, and under-reporting is known to be worst for cyclists and for slight injuries.

What this means for you

What actually changes the odds in Scottish Borders

Data is only useful if it changes what you do. These three are picked from Scottish Borders’s own figures above, each with the number that prompted it. Every guide explains how the thing works before it suggests buying anything, and most cost less than a third of a typical insurance excess.

Alarmed disc lock

£20–£50

Motorcyclists are in 22% of Scottish Borders's collisions, and bikes are also lifted rather than ridden away. An alarmed disc lock covers the theft half for about £30.

How it works →

We are a data business, not a retailer: these link to our guides, which link on to retailers. Some of those links earn us a small commission at no cost to you, and we hold no stock and take no payment for placement. All security guides.

Keep exploring